Set on the remote island of Inishmaan off the west coast of Ireland just before the outbreak of WW2, word arrives that a Hollywood film is being made on the neighboring island of Inishmore. The one person who wants to be in the film more than anybody is young Cripple Billy, if only to break away from the bitter tedium of his daily life. Billy forges a doctor's letter saying that he has TB and only months to live in order to get sympathy from Babbybobby and a ride in his boat over to Inishmore, where he is spotted by the Director and taken to Hollywood for a screen test. Having failed the test, Cripple Billy returns home to find that life will probably never be the same. Finally finding out the truth regarding his parents' apparent suicide, Fate has a couple of surprises still in store for him.
Cast:
Kate Osbourne - Ingrid Craigie
Gillian Osbourne, her sister - Gillian Hanna
Johnnypateenmike - Pat Short
Billy - Daniel Radcliffe
Bartley McCormick - Conor MacNeill
Helen McCormick, his sister - Sarah Greene
Babbybobby - Padraic Delaney
Doctor - Gary Lilburn
Mammy, Johnnypateenmike's elderly mother - June Watson
Creative Team:
Written by Martin McDonagh
Director: Michael Grandage
Set and costumes - Christopher Oram
Lighting - Paule Constable
I think if you were any member of the cast other than Daniel
Radcliffe, you would be really quite peed off with both the Noel Coward Theatre
and Mr. Grandage. Not only is Mr.
Radcliffe’s mug plastered up all over the outside of the theatre and all over
the programme cover (just him, mind you), but he is the only member of the cast
given a solo bow at the end of the show.
Full company bow, solo bow by Mr. Radcliffe, full company bow, solo bow
by Mr. Radcliffe, curtain. Yes, I know
he’s young, pretty and Harry Potter (there were at least two sad middle-aged
women having their picture taken outside the theatre of them draping themselves
over the pictures of Mr. Potter) and a very bankable star name, but this play
is very much an ensemble piece (and, frankly, the role of Billy is not actually
a very big one). There are other people
in it, is what I’m getting at. But you
wouldn’t know it.
From the same pen as The Beauty Queen of Leenane, this
is quite a slight play, but with
similarly dark overtones and lots of the same kind of comedy. Like Beauty Queen, there are several points
where the plot turns on a sixpence, and you are sit there thinking “Oh my god
[this] is going to happen” but then it suddenly doesn’t and the plot twists
away in another direction, and you are left sitting there feeling that you have
been taken up the garden path and then dumped among the hydrangeas feeling
stupid. There seemed to be very little
actual plot, and I’m not entirely sure what the audience were expecting but
there were an awful lot fewer people in the auditorium after the interval. I could have done with two fewer people in
the auditorium all the way through – the two idiot teenage boys sitting next to
me. One of them tried to get past on his
way to his seat and then barged by before I had managed to get up (narrowly
missing poorly foot) and had not yet learned how to blow his nose on a
handkerchief and treated everyone in the vicinity to a loud and bubbly nasal
symphony every five minutes or so, and neither of them had worked out how to
get sweets out of a small cardboard box quietly nor how to drink through a
straw without a) blowing bubbles in the drink first and b) making that loud slurping noise you get
when the drink is running out and you are chasing the dregs of fluid around the
bottom of the cup. Needless to say, one
of them had a mobile phone which went off during a quiet bit in the second
half.
Most of this play is very, very funny – leaning towards the
“Craggy Island” style. And a certain
amount is very, very dark. And the stage
is very, very dark for a lot of the time as well – off towards the wings
everything fades into obscurity -
thankfully most of the action is well centred on stage but there is at least
one (non-essential but funny) part involving a bible that you may well miss
unless you have been eating all your carrots.
The funny lines come so thick and fast that you could miss a lot of the
jokes because you are laughing so much, and then it all gets very serious, and
then very funny again and then very serious – leaving me feeling rather like I
was sitting on a rollercoaster. It gets
a little tiring eventually. Mr. Radcliffe's accent wanders a bit now and again.
It would be invidious to pick out any individual performance
because, as I said before, this is an ensemble piece – unless you are Daniel
Radcliffe – and everyone is very good.
Sometimes the Irish brogues are a bit too thick to be penetrable and
sometimes the dialogue goes too fast for comfort, but overall its well-paced
and slick throughout, which is fortunate because it could become self-indulgent
at a slower pace. The lighting could be better at times, but all in all it’s
a fun evening out, even if the plot is essentially unrealistic. Why people walked out at the interval I don’t
know – perhaps they were expecting Mr. Radcliffe to be whizzing round the stage
on a Nimbus 2000? Apparently he was
handed a pile of scripts by Mr. Grandage and told “pick one you fancy being in
and we’ll do it”. It is to Mr. Radcliffe’s
credit that he picked something which didn’t supply him with a “star vehicle” to the detriment of the rest of
the cast. I would still have liked to
see everyone get their own bow at the final curtain, however.
What the critics thought:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2013/jun/18/the-cripple-of-inishmaan-review
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/theatre-review-daniel-radcliffe-gives-an-admirably-honest-performance-the-cripple-of-inishmaan--but-his-irish-accent-isnt-quite-there-8663412.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/theatre-reviews/10127301/The-Cripple-of-Inishmaan-Noel-Coward-Theatre-review.html
http://www.theartsdesk.com/theatre/cripple-inishmaan-no%C3%ABl-coward-theatre
http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2013/jun/18/the-cripple-of-inishmaan-review
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/theatre-review-daniel-radcliffe-gives-an-admirably-honest-performance-the-cripple-of-inishmaan--but-his-irish-accent-isnt-quite-there-8663412.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/theatre-reviews/10127301/The-Cripple-of-Inishmaan-Noel-Coward-Theatre-review.html
http://www.theartsdesk.com/theatre/cripple-inishmaan-no%C3%ABl-coward-theatre
No comments:
Post a Comment
These are my opinions. I am entitled to them. As you are to yours. If you are going to respond to my opinions, at least make your responses worthwile. Vitriol is pointless. And more importantly, won't get published - so you'll be shouting in the dark.